Thursday, March 31, 2011

Facile Criticism of Literary Classics


Usually, I am loathe to criticize books that are part of the cannon. This is entirely different from criticizing the cannon itself, which has been the subject of plenty of legitimate criticism. But though the cannon should include more works by women and minorities, the works that are typically included are generally there for a reason. Who would I be to suggest that Shakespeare is overrated? What value would there be in me listing my ill founded complaints about Oedipus Rex or Paradise Lost? Mostly I just accept that these are great books and if I didn't fully enjoy them, it's likely that the problem is with me, not the book. I am especially loathe to criticize a canonical book that is written by a woman author. Nonetheless, here I go.

To quote from the Afterword to my edition of Uncle Tom's Cabin: "For the literary critic, the problem is simply how a book so seemingly artless, so lacking in apparent literary talent, was not only an immediate success but has endured." That is a good question, indeed.

Uncle Tom's Cabin is a melodrama written with the best of intentions. If its publication brought about the end of slavery even one minute sooner than otherwise would have been the case--and my understanding is that the book did have a significant propaganda impact--then for that I give it the highest praise I possibly can.

But it is not really suitable for modern readers except for those reading to try to understand the relationship between literature and current events. Judging solely by literary standards, the book is a failure. Characters are badly drawn, the plot depends on random coincidence, and the mood of the writing is melodramatic to unbearable degrees. Harriet Beecher Stowe's perspective, while progressive for her time, is clearly informed by her own cultural baggage that puts distance between the author and her characters. There is a reason that being called an Uncle Tom has become a insulting epithet.

Racial issues have become enormously complex, and this book no longer furthers the conversation. Get some Frederick Douglas or Toni Morrison instead.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Tuesdays with Beer: Jersey's


It's been a couple of weeks, but the Tuesdays with Beer feature returns. This week we are at bar/restaurant Jersey's, the one lonely alcohol outpost out on the bypass. This time it was a family affair, with Matt and I accompanied by (Matt's wife) Penni and four-year old Ian.

As we entered Jersey's, the first thing we noticed was that the music was somewhere near 120 decibels, around the same volume as a jet engine. This would not be so weird at a popular nightspot, but the fact that it was a 6 o'clock on a Tuesday, and there were less than a half dozen people in the joint made it rather conspicuous. The waitress apparently noticed our discomfort, because she quickly told us that she didn't know how to turn the music down. Eventually the quarters ran out and the Queen subsided.

Jersey's is not a bad looking place inside. On one side is a restaurant area with around a dozen large tables. The other side is the bar area. We sat at first in the restaurant and ordered a bunch of fried stuff: cheese balls, mini-corn dogs, and popcorn chicken. Also a flatbread Philly sandwich and a chipolte club sandwich. The food was...meh. Granted, the only competing bar restaurant in the area is Stadium, but, for instance, my club sandwich came on a hoagie bun, which was not expected. It wasn't exactly bad, but it wasn't exactly any different from a sandwich I might buy at a gas station, either. Jersey's food can leave an impression. When we walked in Ian said, "oh no, daddy we came here one time and ate outside and it wasn't very good." The mind of a four year old doesn't forget crappy food. But at least the nice sunny day on the patio was memorable.

On the other hand, the beer on tap at Jersey's is of better quality than the usual fare. They include Shiner Bock and Black Label, Woodchuck (for the ladies), Sam Adams Seasonal, Boulevard, Fat Tire, Mich Golden, Coors, Miller Lite, and--according to an advertisement--Madison's #1 beer Bud Light. Also, a good selection of bottled beers. If you can't find something to enjoy in the beer department, you are too picky. Boxed wine and champagne also available.

Like most area establishments, there is plenty of video lottery on hand, with a separate room cordoned off for your hardcore players. On the bar side of the venue, there is a Spider-Box game, which looks dangerous, as well as Big Buck Hunter (which is dangerous), a jukebox, dartboards, and a pool table. A sign indicated a beer pong league meets there, but they were not present tonight. A few seemingly random jerseys adorn the walls. Some are for Minnesota teams, while others appear to be bought from the dollar bin at Scheels, such as Yankees and Lakers jerseys that serve little apparent purpose. Perhaps what I like best about the bar area is the view out of a small, backward facing window of the grain elevator. As the sun went down we got a great look at one of the iconic small-town images.

Not unlike the Seasonal Sam on tap, we are theorizing that Jerseys is a seasonal bar. During the winter if feels small and bleak, but during the summer, you can enjoy the patio, order a pizza, and watch a train make it's leisurely journey down the tracks. It's a dead end bar that feels like it's going places. We hope to return to Jerseys later this year, sit outside in the summer sun, and get away from that God damned music.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Pants on Fire


Amy Chua got a lot of ink earlier this year for her essay about motherhood, but since I'm perpetually behind the times, I'm just getting to her 2004 book about globalization, democracy, and market-dominant minorities. Chua asks here how it came to be that in many places around the globe small ethnic minorities came to have a disproportionally large share of the wealth--and to her credit, she mostly answers this question without sounding like a huge racist. She points to market liberalization and democratization as two major forces that can cause these disparities, but also as forces that allow for indigenous backlashes against their beneficiaries. In short, market liberalization can create huge sums of wealth for those in a position to take advantage of it, while simultaneous democratization can give the general population the tools to harshly punish market-dominant minorities (the rather unwieldy term she uses throughout the book). These forces can lead to persecution--and in extreme cases, even genocide--of those minorities with disproportionally large economic presence.

The first half of the book is Chua's description of market-dominant minorities in various cultures: the Chinese in southeast Asia, lighter skinned people in Latin America, Jews in Russia, and the market dominent ethnic groups of Africa, including those still benefitting from colonialist histories. In the second half of the book, she describes some of the atrocities that have arisen in combination with free markets and democratization.

What I thought was missing was a cogent analysis of how market-dominant ethnic minorities became so prevalent beyond some vague notions about cultural work-ethic. I would have liked to hear Chua talk more about relative educational opportunity, access to resources and capital, and to see more of an emphasis on colonialist heritage. In addition, while the problems that Chua identifies are certainly real, I'm not sure what alternative to democratization there is to believe in. Clearly, a rapidly democratizing society with extreme wealth imbalance does pose risks, but it's not palatable to suggest that the status quo is acceptable either. Surely we must be able to somehow encourage democratization while also mitigating the resentment that can be directed at market-dominant minorities.

It's a complex topic, and I think Chua's book would be stronger if it were about 100 pages longer, giving her appropriate space to reflect on some of the issues she raises in greater detail.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

It came from the (early) 70s...


These guys were heralded as the stars of the Pub Rock Scene. Personally, I don't think you need to look too hard to find better examples of the genre (Ernie Graham, Eggs Over Easy), but come on, this is Nick Lowe.

Brinsley Schwarz - Country Girl

Old summer day, the first day of spring.

I was 14 and cool. Some of my friends were driving but I was content cruising town on what I called "The Turquoise Dream." On that bike I was a green streak. One mysterious, boisterous obnoxious. 14 and on the back deck, listening to "Where It's At." In 1996 I was taping sweet songs from MTV onto a small black tape recorder. I was most definitely wearing shades--and probably looking pretty bored.

I'm now 29 and dated. I'm driving now and consistently neglecting the turquoise dream. It sits in my kitchen. I like to think of myself in shades of green these days, but the heavy blues are gone and now its just more and more neutral. Truly, strangely stagnant. 29 and in my living room, on an uncomfortable couch, wikipediaing to find out when Odelay was released. I'm wearing a vest--and definitely looking bored.

15 years. Mike McGrane, Cliff Stone, Curt Beasley, Robert Johnson, Courtney Walker, Darlane Jensen, Jason Bottolfson, Buddy the dog. There are certainly more. But we also have Evan and Aubrey George, Natalie Serfling, Briley and Easton Meyer, Pearl Weiland, a slew of Ericcsons and, before we blink, a new Duffy. (Certainly more). It's a wild cycle. Right now I want a dog. In a couple of months I think I might get a new one.

Friday, March 18, 2011

'Burghers: Ennui riding a rising tide

Formation of Tides will be released April 5.
About three weeks ago I saw Jim Doutrich at karaoke. He gave me shit about liking folk music and then sang some song from the 80s. Neither of these things came as much of a surprise to me; I had it coming and I knew Jim's style. What did catch me off guard, though, was his singing. I can't remember if it was Wang Chung or the Thompson Twins but I was dumbfounded. I then, like an idiot, went around with a stupid grin on my face saying stuff like "Who knew?" and "Jim's got a voice!" Nobody said anything. The night drove on and, after a couple of beers, I nailed "Someday" by Sugar Ray, had a couple more beers and put another Thursday behind me.

I ran into Jim the next night and he blew my mind when he said one of his songs had been downloaded, like, 3,000 times that day. Turns out Jim has a band--he has since 2004. Not only that, but they had an album ripe for the shelves. This explained why no one was as surprised as me that night at the Cantina.

The band, Ennui, is a two-man operation. Jim sings and writes the songs, plays guitar and keyboard. Sam McUmber, a classically trained pianist, takes on the rest. What results is a whirlwind of vintage synths and waves of harmonies, all under a blanket of reverb. It's some dense, sticky stuff and they are going to show it off live Friday night at the Brillobox in Lawrenceville.

The past seven years have seen several incarnations of Ennui. They started as a four piece that criss crossed the country. A couple of years went by and a three piece released a well received LP. The band has only recently had to adjust to playing as a duo.

"There's more concentration involved," Doutrich said. "If you have four people in a band and only two are really motivated or involved, it's pointless. For Sam and I, when we get together, we're both fully motivated--it's great."

"It's more likely that we can get on the same wavelength," McUmber added. "Our creative goals are easier to reach."

Even though the new formation has allowed them to focus on a more electronic sound, something Doutrich and McUmber were both interested in, the band also tried to make the album sound as organic as possible.

"We recorded it all on tape, using vintage synths," Doutrich said. "We wanted a live feel to it. Our last album was really studio heavy, it was conceived in the studio. For this one, all the songs were hashed out. We knew we wanted it to have a '70s ambient rock feel to it."

In all, 15 different synthesizers were used in the recording including a Yamaha CS80 and Vangelis Prophet 5. While the album has drawn sound comparisons to Berlin and the Top Gun Soundtrack, the songs fit naturally alongside more contemporary acts like Cut Copy and Grizzly Bear.

The results so far have been telling, as the band recently opened up for Deerhoof and have been featured on a slew of blogs. They even appearing as the soundtrack to the making of a dessert. For the first time, Doutrich has given up the promotional duties, allowing him to focus more of his attention on the music and artwork.

"I hired someone because I don't want to waste my energy," Doutrich said. " In the past I spent too much attention on promoting and setting up shows, too much attention on making it big instead of the music. It's kind of paying for a luxury."

They're hoping that cooperation will lead to bigger and better things.

"I think this album should be heard," McUmber said. "We're unique in Pittsburgh and musically I think we're on par with any other indie music out there. We have the musical skill and the creative voice and I think that's unique."

The show starts at 9:30 p.m.

                                                      

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

One tough drunk: A case for Grant

Forget your preconceived notions about Grant the President. There were scandals, but I think they can be attributed to having bad friends, not being weak. This is why I think Grant can take Roosevelt:

Upbringing: His roots in Ohio and his West Point experience prove Grant is of a hardier stock than the hobby-hunting, gun club Roosevelt. Grant's father was a tanner, which leads me to believe that number 18 had his hide tanned many-a-time. At West Point, he certainly wasn't the smartest (finishing in the bottom half of his class) but he had a reputation for fearlessness. Teddy may have been a boxer, but he was a boxer at Harvard. Advantage: Grant.

War Experience: Grant, proving his relentlessness, led the Union troops into Shiloh on the way to Antietam. This was the bloodiest battle in American history. Needless to say, he won't shy away from the fight. Even though Teddy's experience was in the endlessly funny Mexican-American War, he is the only President to be awarded the Medal of Honor. This one's a draw.

Tactics: Grant was a drinker. There is no denying this. He also seemed like the brooding, drinks-by-himself kind of drinker. These folks are dangerously bad communicators and often let their fists do the talking when a negotiator may think twice. I see Roosevelt as a negotiator, sacrificing the first blow or two to a staggering Grant. Advantage: Grant.

Legacy Grudge: Grant's is a hardened, hard-luck story. Aside from the Presidency, he had to earn everything along the way. I just have a feeling that when matched up against the beloved Roosevelt, he'd picture him with the silver spoon he was born with and that would make him all the more motivated. Conversely, I think Teddy comes into the fight with a clear head and a degree of mutual respect. Advantage: Grant.

If they fought 10 times and it was determined Roosevelt would win nine, my money is still on Grant. This is about guts and I think Grant shows up.

Friday, March 11, 2011

Foggy Memories

Calling all nerds!

Got some free time? I started a wiki-page/sister site over at backwheniwasyourage.pbworks.com. I guess I'm just trying to create communal memory. From events to catch phrases to people catalog, hopefully this will run the gamut. I'm going to get the ball rolling and I'd love it if you stopped by to help.

New music and old movies

Anticipating five spring albums and reminiscing with my favorite movie scenes of the week

The Pains of Being Pure at Heart: Belong
3/29
Their first, self-titled, album didn't really hit me until this year. It was the Vaselines, Pastels, cutesy-schmutesiness that rubbed me the wrong way initially, but lately I've been gravitating to that albums' shy, don't-look-at-me guitar fuzz clinging to the bottom of the mix. If the two tracks I've heard off this new album are any indication, that fuzz has grown from whiskers into stubble (thanks in part to the surprise producer of the year--Flood). This is probably my favorite of the neo-90s groups that have recently been popping their heads out of NYC, mainly because they aren't glossing over any of that decade's plenty glossy moments. 

Belong

Sonny and the Sunsets: Hit After Hit
4/12
When a band is prolific it's easy to see past some of their shortcomings. That being said, I'm not expecting much out of this album at all. These guys did release my sleeper-favorite album last summer, Tomorrow Is Alright. And on top of that, lead man Sonny Smith had an art show this past fall where he built a juke box and filled it with 100 45's--all of which he recorded, disguised as 100 different bands. Long story short, this album can suck (I doubt it will) and I will still appreciate them.

I Wanna Do It

Cass McCombs: Wit's End
4/26
Where's the Bill Callahan? Well, there haven't been any tracks released from his upcoming album (due April 19). I love me some Bill Callahan, so that's probably number one on the anticipation list. Cass McCombs isn't too far behind, though. He has that foggy familiarity that Callahan has mastered. It sounds effortless as he slides from mood to mood while his songs feign bravery, falling like the first drops of rain on a persistently cloudy day. His past couple of albums have begged to be listened to and this new one is supposed to be darker and smoother. In the past, that's when he's been at his best.

County Line

Fleet Foxes: Helplessness Blues
5/3
After Animal Collective, are they the biggest American band right now? I don't think Wilco or the Flaming Lips still have a valid claim to such a title. It doesn't seem like anyone really gives a shit about Jack White anymore (what took so long?). My Morning Jacket? The Decemberists? They aren't as good. Grizzly Bear aren't as engaging and Vampire Weekend seem too gimmicky. A lot of people will be listening.

Helplessness Blues

White Denim: D
5/24
And finally some real rock and roll. The best on the list and the best in the biz. Is there any doubt with this one? It is going to be sweet!

Drug


I think I slept eight hours this week--homework and insomnia. After I got tired of tossing my sheets around, I eventually gave up and watched some movies. I loved these parts.

The big fight in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.


This one's a little longer but you haven't seen anything like it! Released just before Star Wars, this is a young Mark Hammel on the run from some jerk who wants to kill him. The movie is Corvette Summer, it's on Netflix, and you should DEFINITELY watch it sometime.


Paul Newman and Larry McMurtry and I hadn't seen it. Shameful. Anyway, this was as good as you might expect. The clip below showcases Newman's ability to let other people drive the story. He always has such a dynamic presence and when he's relegated to the background, it feels big. Still, he steals the scene...

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Spring Ahead

When the northern hemisphere warms up our minds start to come out of hibernation and all our hopes and ideas seem so achievable. You see the earth around you starting to come alive and feel that anything can be accomplished. I go through this every year and yet some how by the time the next winter rolls around I find that I have been hypnotised by the dog days of summer.

As the snow and spring showers wash away the topsoil and memories of the past year I declare that it is time to spring ahead and move into the next decade of my life. I will take a stand and embrace the extended hours of daylight to move on and become inspired to the man I've always wanted to be. I will be a better friend a better lover a better son a better brother.

Spring brings around a time for reflection and rebirth. As the world around me goes through these changes I will move on with the seasons. I am starting to embrace the idea of aging as I approach my 30th birthday. I am a better person than I was year ago and as I shed my skin to move on through the next year I will embrace the changes that come with each new spring.

I am taking this spring and using it as a high dive to dazzle and amaze those around me. I am ready to take the big leap and pull off that back flip into a can opener and make a monumental splash. Life can be strange, beautiful, and painful all at the same time. So as the earth starts its cycle of life again I urge you to reflect and embrace this season for all its glory and underlying beauty it holds.

Till next time
Dave

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Guilty Tortures

I'm a reader with democratic tendencies. I like all levels of brow. I like fiction, non-fiction, poetry, genre literature, academic tomes, and racquetball advice books. So while I read my share of classics, I am always on the lookout for what is called a "guilty pleasure". For me this often takes the shape of a schlocky horror novel (this is also true of my taste in films). The trouble with guilty pleasures, is that one has to read so many guilty tortures to find a real guilty pleasure. Sometimes you have to just be satisfied with a few good pages out of a whole novel. So it is in the spirit of trying to find guilty pleasures that I will occasionally review a book that you may find questionable. Usually, these books will indeed turn out be letdowns, but we'll never know until we try them. And when you do find the one that is in fact a real pleasure, well, what a great feeling that is. Here then, is my first bwiwya guilty torture post, about a sci-fi/horror novel by Dean Koontz called Midnight:

Midnight sports a lot of Koontz's usual tropes. Among them are: the good-hearted protagonist that has experienced a loss, the angelic and unrealistically mature child, the unnecessary romance between main characters in the midst of mayhem, the remorseless mad scientist, the cute dog, and the easily predictable horror/sci-fi premise. Reading Koontz is too often like reading a screenplay for a March release Hollywood film--just very little complexity or surprises.

That said, this is far from the worst Koontz book I've read. There are at least two scenes that I thought employed effective visuals--one is a tense chase scene at the opening of the book, the other a curious close-call with one of the book's creatures--a sort of werewolf--that stares into a window of a house and idly taps a finger on the windowpane while our hero crouches against the wall and hopes he isn't noticed.

But there are way too many gaffes to give Midnight any sort of recommendation. Just listen to some of this writing. From page 104: "Harry stared at the apelike countenance, thought it was leaner and uglier and more fierce and infinitely stranger than the face of an ape." This sort of writing makes me crazy. Infinitely stranger than the face of an ape? That phrase has exactly zero meaning. Or from page 108, when a cry in the distance is described as "shrill yet guttural." Koontz does this kind of thing all the time--he was tall yet short, the sound was loud yet quiet. A good writer can give a description of the uncanny without resorting to nonsense.

I need to add something about a serious plot hole as well. The plot of this book has most of the citizens of a small town being changed to so-called "New People" in an experiment of which they are unwilling members. These New People are animalistic in that they live for essentially food and sexual pleasure only. Some of the New People embrace their wildness and go nuts. Others are worried and perplexed about losing their emotions. But none of those that loses their emotions ever ventures outside the community to seek help. Instead, the whole town gets turned over the course of a couple weeks with no one ever saying anything. If I thought my humanity had been stolen by a local mad scientist, I would hope some equally enterprising scientist elsewhere might be able to give it back to me. But what do I know? Also, no visitors ever notice anything weird about their relatives?

I saved the best for last though. The maudlin concluding scene of the novel is unbearable. The protagonist Sam is bitter at the beginning of the novel because he has had a near death experience and didn't like what he saw on the other side. What horrible thing comes after death that Sam saw, we wonder. Tessa, his love interest, brings Sam around to the life-affirming viewpoint that all Koontz characters are required to hold by the novel's end. The big reveal is that Sam was upset to see that there is an afterlife of some kind--you see, he hated living so much that he was mad that he would keep living. If that isn't the lamest plot point you've come across, then God help you.

Anyway, now Sam is on-board again with loving being alive, and he and Tessa return to his home where Sam hopes to make amends with his estranged teenage son. How does he do this? In a virtuoso display of unintentional satire, Koontz has Sam destroy his son's rock n' roll albums. I'm not even kidding.

Sunday, March 6, 2011

For the love of free music



This is a heads up, fyi kind of thing. One of my daily stops on the internet, Aquarium Drunkard, has recently reposted a couple of awesome--and free--mixes from the sun-kissed California coast. This is more than 60 songs all coming from the late 60s and 70s. Who cares if it's doubling up some of your iTunes, it's free! And groovy!

It came from the (early) 70s...


If I have a beef with Omaha, NE, it lies in its overblown, self-important music scene. Has it always been this way? What kind of swagger did the old scenesters have? Keep your Bright Eyes, give me Eugene McDaniels.

Instead of an MP3, I'm posting this video because I think it's a hell of a music/movie mash-up. The clips are apparently from a '70s French western starring Briggite Bardot called "Frenchie King." Looks like it's right up my alley. It also looks like it's kind of hard to find these days.

Never Take a Wolverine to the Senior Prom

So my week of excess is over and done with. It shall remain in infamy. While the new ideas start rolling in, I'd like to share with you a story written by my father's nom de plume, Ted Martin. I hope you enjoy it!


Never Take a Wolverine to the Senior Prom

The other night I watched a TV show about wolverines. The narrator said they’re the most grumpy, vicious, anti-social animals on planet earth. Scientists aren’t even sure how the species perpetuates itself; male and female wolverines can’t be within a mile of one-another without getting into some big fur-flying, spit-swinging battle royale.

That reminds me of my senior prom.

I’d dated the same girl (we’ll call her “Linda Lou”) all through high school. The two of us were both tall, shy and awkward. We both had pimples and hated dancing. In my mind, we were a perfect couple. I’d assumed we would go to the Prom, hang-out around the punch bowl and make snide remarks about the other kids all night long – a regular evening, in other words, only more dressed-up. But then good old Linda met this hotshot college guy (Lance) and a week before the Prom she announced to everybody that she’d be going with him.

Well, when my cousin Tom heard the news, he panicked. We’d been planning to double, you see, and I was going to drive because Tom had lost his “driving privileges” when his mid-term grades didn’t quite meet expectations – four Ds and an Incomplete. At first, he figured, maybe they’d bail-out on the whole dance thing, too, or maybe ride their bikes (which would have been really creepy).

But then, good-old Lean, Mean Charlene (the String Bean), Tom's date, came up with a plan…

“Char knows this girl,” Tom said brightly the next day at lunch. “She’s from out of town and she’s supposed to be cute. She might be willing to go to the Prom with you.”

I knew the town he was talking about. It was in Missouri, just over the state line. It was the ugliest, dirtiest, most scraggly-assed little hamlet in the Third Federal Reserve District and there was absolutely no reason to go there except to buy fireworks and beer, so naturally we went there often. The only girls I’d ever seen there looked like trolls. But I was game, up to a point…

“Are you saying she’s cute,” I asked warily, “or is Charlene?” I knew from bitter experience that there could be a world of difference.

“I’ve never actually seen her,” he replied, somewhat evasively and a little uneasily I thought, “but Char swears she’s okay. And anyway, her name is Debbie Reynolds. How bad can she be?”

A pert, virginal young actress named Debbie Reynolds was then starring in wildly popular Hollywood movies like “Tammy Tell Me True” and “Tammy and the Doctor.” I’d watched them at the drive-in with good old “Linda” and there was no denying that the Hollywood Debbie was pretty cute. Exactly why that led me to conclude that Debbie from Crudbucket, Missouri would be equally fetching evades me today, but at the time it must have made perfect sense, so I said threw back a shot of milk and said, “Sure, why not.”

The next few days were busy ones. I waxed my mother’s car, got a haircut, picked up my rented tux and bought a big, flashy orchid corsage for Debbie. I wouldn’t actually be meeting her until the big night.

At about eight o’clock the evening of Prom night, with cousin Tom and Mean Charlene nestled in the back seat of my mom’s Merc, I hiked up to Debbie’s door, kicking aside the beer cans and dodging a dog. I was nervous, of course, and it didn’t help that my rented tux’s trousers were about three inches too short. My rented patent leather shoes were spectacular, though. I studied my reflection in the glass of the storm door (“Looks pretty good…”), gave my hair a quick raking through, and rang the doorbell. As I waited, a vision of Hollywood Debbie, all curvy and cute and cuddly, took form in my mind...

You can imagine my shock then at what instead appeared. Debbie my date looked nothing like Hollywood Debbie and certainly not like anything Tom and that lying Charlene had described. For openers, she was short! About four-eleven.  And I was 6’4.” Dancing cheek to cheek would be out of the question.  And where was that “long blond hair” I’d been promised? This Debbie had tightly-wound black curls that made her scalp look like a furry little helmet!

Okay, so she wasn’t cute. Was that the worst crime in history? Maybe she’d make up for it with a great little personality.  But, no…

Even shielded by the glass in the storm door I could sense some sort of sinister aura surrounding Podunk Debbie. She just radiated hostility. I’d never felt such cyclonic, insane wrath, not even from old Mister Neufeld, my algebra teacher. 

Numbly and with a strange static-like buzzing in my ears, I opened the door and handed Debbie her orchid corsage. It was pink, her dress was purple – not a good match. But of course, neither were we. She glared at it with dark, narrow-set, ferret eyes. I’m not sure she actually pinned it on, though; I think maybe she ate it.

Like a condemned prisoner mounting the gallows, I knew that from this moment forward things would only get worse. Suddenly awash with sweat I began to feel myself slipping into shock. We got to the Prom, but I don’t remember how. And when we walked in, we were greeted with almost total silence. I say “almost total” because from somewhere off in the distance I could hear Linda Lou and Lance (that lizard) laughing, at us. And what a sight we must have been – tall, terrified me stumbling along like a zombie in the wake of my baleful little date. I swear there was steam hissing out her ears. Maybe that’s why her hair was so curly.

Debbie, it developed, saw dancing as combat. Fast song or slow, she threw me around like a rag. Darryll “Duke” Irons, an all-state tackle I’d twice had the misfortune of facing in football, had nothing on her. By the end of the third song I had a split lip and a dislocated shoulder. By ten o’clock I’d lost all feeling from the waist down, a blessing because she’d stomped on my foot and crushed my big toe. An hour later, I crawled into the boys’ locker room, praying she’d let me die. Soon, though, in came Tom: “You better get up,” he warned. “They’re gonna play the Bunny Hop and she says you better cut the crap.”

I’ve lost all memory of the following few hours, much like you do after a car crash involving serious head injuries. In retrospect, however, I do give Debbie credit for one thing. Around midnight, she splashed cold water on my face, carried me out of the gym and threw me in the back seat of my mother’s car. She then drove us to the locally famous Tally Ho restaurant where the three of them had a very nice dinner (I’m told). I still couldn’t walk, so I waited in the car, but after an hour or so she brought me a little hunk of bloody-red steak in a doggy bag.

I’d been wrong about Debbie…  A real wolverine wouldn’t have shared her meat.  

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Methinks We Do Not Protest Enough

Inspired by the extraordinary events happening in Wisconsin, yesterday I took to Pierre for the Stand Up for Education rally, ready to do my damnedest to stop the proposed 10% cut to education funding proposed by South Dakota's Governor Dennis Daugaard (Dewey to his friends). You may have seen my beautiful face on eastern South Dakota's NBC affiliate, KDLT. I'm famous!

The "protest" did accomplish one important goal--it got coverage on all the local news shows, and space in area newspapers. This is no small accomplishment and it deserves respect. However, what the protest did not do, was adequately demonstrate the anger of the electorate over the decimation of our already chronically underfunded schools. It was exactly the sort of polite, coffee and pie in the church basement kind of affair that makes very little impact on policy-makers. Education proponents have been nicely asking for funding for 30 years with no success. I don't understand what makes them think they can ask nicely for these cuts to be undone and get any results.

Here's what we did: sat in committee hearings (though the organizers had us trying to attend hearings that were not even happening on the day of the event), tried to find our local representatives to make our views known (this was close to impossible as legislators have no offices as far as I can tell and you had to simply hope to run into them in the hallways), and, in the one well-orchestrated part of the day, listen to a dozen or legislators that were already on our side.

What we did not do: show up in any kind of impressive numbers. There were about 100 people present, rather than the 1000 that could have started to be heard. 100 people at a protest tells legislators that hardly anyone cares enough to show up. We did not march, have signs, chant or in any way visably demonstrate our displeasure. No one knows how the situation in Wisconsin is going to turn out, but the protesters there, with their relentless application of political pressure, have given themselves substantially better odds of winning their fight than we did. Politicians are under no obligation to respond to well-reasoned argument or a reasonable alternative. The one thing they are obigated to listen to is overwhelming political pressure that they sense impedes their ability to continue to wield power. We are not producing anything close to that right now.

Of particular note was a conversation between Matt Groce and our own District 8 State Senator and fratboy tool Russell Olson. Olson suggested that school districts should have no problem handling cuts because their reserves are too large. When asked to envision how he sees the education funding issue being resolved "in a perfect world" he essentially said that Dewey's proposal in fact represents a perfect world. Deep cuts to education are perfect. At no time during the 10 minute conversation did he express any worry that deep cuts to education funding would result in worse outcomes for students. In committee the same day, he was the only vote against a bill that allow for a public vote on raising taxes to pay for education (he is so anti-tax that he won't even let his idiot constituents raise taxes on themselves, you see). This was the first time I had ever met Olson, but he certainly met the descriptions I had heard of him--dishonest, incurious, unwilling (or perhaps not imaginative enough) to consider proposals other than the one his party has handed him. He is a local George Bush Jr.

The ultimate fate of education funding in this year's budget remains to be seen, and it's still possible that education advocates might rally enough votes to avert disaster. But South Dakotans that care about this stuff need to get over their fear of offending those in power or making a ruckus of any sort. Quietly passing around a petition isn't going to do it. Politics is the clash of powerful interests, and the defeat of anti-education interests will require a lot of South Dakotans standing up and loudly declaring their opposition. I didn't see that yesterday.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

"who is harry nilsson (and why is everybody talkin' about him)" - DVD Review

greetings,


1941 - Harry Nilsson

an exciting documentary about one of the great musicians of the past 50 years was recently released on dvd - "who is harry nilsson (and why is everybody talkin' about him)." for those of you who don't know who harry nilsson is *slap* he is considered by many rock musicologists to be america's answer to the beatles. as a matter of fact, the beatles were so enamored by his first two albums, "pandemonium shadow show" and "aerial ballet" that they publicly announced that he was their favorite american musician. fun fact - harry nilsson debuted the mccartney tune "mother nature's son" on his third lp "harry" prior to its release on "the white album!"



Good Old Desk - Harry Nilsson

"who is harry nilsson (and why is everybody talkin' about him)"
was released late october of 2010 and has been nominated for a 2011 WGA for "best documentary screenplay." rolling stone also reviewed it favorably, giving it 4 stars. in the documentary, special guests regale their experiences with harry from a bank teller-turned-aspiring songwriter, to one of the music businesses most outrageous drunkards. some of the interviewees include: terry gilliam, eric idle, yoko ono, robin williams, randy newman, van dyke parks, brian wilson, and ringo star!

the sound is remarkable too - great released and unreleased excerpts from harry's lps and demo recordings. harry was known for being a musical recluse, rarely ever performing in public. many of these live videos have been vaulted since they were filmed. this alone is worth the price of admission (around 16.00 for the dvd).

Me and My Arrow - Harry Nilsson




for anyone with an interest in harry nilsson or in rock music in general, this is a must see rock-doc.
i purchased my copy at amazon.com, but i would ascertain that it would be an available netflix rental. good luck trying to find it at your local best buy, as harry nilsson isn't the most vogue pop culture icon.


Buy: "who is harry nilsson (and why is everybody talkin' about him)"


until next time,
(be sure to listen to the music links provided - they are some of my favorite nilsson cuts)
-jensen

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Tuesdays with Beer: The Sportsman's Bar



7:10 PM at the Sportsman's Bar, Matt Groce and Brett Hoffman have a drink.

We've been here before, but not often. Last time, we were forced out by a rancid smell emanating from the salad bar. Spinach that had gone bad decades before. Tonight, there was no such smell, maybe because they've moved that same salad bar over to the Sportsman's Lounge restaurant down the street.

We were greeted by music as we walked in, a surprising and welcome development. Last week at the Trojan Tap, the line was quiet enough to hear a pin drop. Not so at the happening Sportsman's this week. Eminem raps about White America and a small crowd of off duty Gehl employees make small talk around the bar. Matt says, "This is where you go for a drink between batches of cooking methamphetamine." True, but not necessarily a bad thing.

Not only was there music to greet us at this bar, but actual people as well. A local town drunk raised his glass to us and mumbled something about "my beer!" Right back at you, man! And look over there, a black man! It's the most diverse bar in Madison.

We walked up to the bar and ordered two Boulevards from the tap. Also available was Bud, Miller Lite, Coors Light, Bud Light, and Amber Bock. Our two beers cost $1.50 each, and absurdly low price. This is a place to drink on a budget. Suck on that Minneapolis! Also, available in bottles were Summit IPA and Summit Octoberfest. Wine was on hand as well--Arbor Mist and Sutter Home.

The money you save can be spent at one of the eight video lottery machines. The bartender told us he had seen people drop $700 in a machine. That's 466 and 2/3 beers! Tonight there was only one guy playing the machines. He smoked an e-cigarette while he played. There's also a pool table and a (working) dart machine.

On the walls was a staggering collection of mirror paintings. You know, the weird amalgam art form that is part mirror, part wildlife painting? There was a lot of that at Sportsman's, and the bar is better for it. Mixed with the wood paneling, it gives the bar a glow. This is your uncle's man-room in his basement. It's a place for working people to feel comfortable. We were out of the ordinary in our sweaters, but not out of place.

The bartender deserves a note of his own. He evidently doesn't work too often, because the regulars seemed surprised to see him behind the counter. But he was a charming older guy in a plaid shirt, with a rag hanging out of his back pocket. He was nervous talking to us, but clearly a good guy, and I bet a real character if you got to know him. He is small town bartender of your dreams. He took our word that we were over 21. The glasses hanging above him in the bar probably haven't been used in 20 years.

You can bring your big-city friends here, though it's hard to say why I am so comfortable saying that. Like it's cousin across the street, Foley's, this bar is natural and at-home in Madison. For whatever reason, this is not the place where most people I know tend to go, but it could easily have become my default bar if I knew more people that went there. In some ways, it is the inverse of the Trojan Tap--not conscientiously drawing any particular crowd. Under the prairie sky, this is the kind of bar where devils and angels come to sit, have a drink, and put their differences behind them for a few hours.

Going phrazy!


The pop culture imbibing world has got a new catchphrase this week courtesy of a dude with a brain that “fires in a way that is — I don’t know, maybe not from this particular terrestrial realm.” He’s Charlie Sheen, of course. I’ll admit, I get way too much entertainment value out of reality TV and the regular nonsense that TMZ and Inside Edition report upon. It’s escapism. But, for me, I’d rather get a chuckle out of the human zoo that these outlets depict, than feel angst about Wisconsin, North Africa, the state debt crises, what the idiots that populate our state legislatures are doing to address those budget issues, the unemployment rate, or how nearly 4 years out of law school - having put up an above 3 GPA and participated in the law review - I can still not find full-time employment at a law firm. So, despite all the troubles, I’m with Charlie . . . I’m “winning”.

It’s so simple. Just found out that I’ve got another temp job starting soon. Winning! Got an email address for a girl that I might hang out with. Double winning! Even when confronted with bad news or an accusation of ineptitude, the term is still accessible. Charlie demonstrated it when he was asked if he was perhaps bi-polar and responded that he was “bi-winning”. Next time I overeat, I’m over-winning. A few too many cocktails, it’s only too much winning. If somebody ever told me I was bad at fantasy football, which I am, I’ll just turn it around on them ‘Oh, yeah, well you’re lousy at winning’. The “winning” mindset may even be good for your overall health. It’s best not to be too hard on one self, and what better way to take it easy than to simply announce that you are “winning” whenever the opportunity arises. What a tool; what a great catchphrase!

Unfortunately, this post is two days after “winning” hit the airwaves, and the term may already be too overplayed for me to adopt “winning” as a true catchphrase. The terms that I have always used the most have been stolen, but from sources that are either relatively obscure or so far out of date that no one knows the extent of my lack of creativity in my overuse of phrases. I was a big Henry Miller fan in college, and so, like Henry, after a powerful, profound or ridiculous comment I’d say “What!” I got into Kurt Vonnegut after Miller, and like so many Kurt fans, after stating something that was generally unchangeable or a little depressing came the obligatory “so it goes”. As my tastes changed from world class literature to garbage reality TV, so did the catchphrases. I am still trying to kick my Gordon Ramsay inspired “yeah” in question form habit. Luckily for me, I believe that tendency is starting to wane, in its heyday I received some pretty weird looks from girls after asking “Yeah?” following nearly every statement. Maybe if I had thrown in Flava Flav’s “come and get your clock” to those girls who didn’t completely roll their eyes, I’d have had better luck. There’s also the movie Strange Brew’s “beauty”, and probably some more, so it goes. What!

The thing with catchphrases is that it’s kind of an organic thing. I don’t remember consciously adopting any of those that I have used. Maybe once in a while to be a jerk, but I don’t remember those really sticking. So, if “winning” sticks, only time will tell. At least there’s a really cool Santana song that could be my theme then.


First blog post. Winning!